Nisus writer express review pdf#
visual basic, instead of perl, python, ruby, PHP, java etc), PDF (until recently), SVG, Postcript (eg: you can get a generic Postscript printer driver from Adobe that lets a Windows machine use a networked CUPs printer, but you can’t get such a driver from Microsoft), LDAP, CIFS (sp? I think thats it anyway), etc, etc. There are multiple examples of this: HTML & CSS for web pages (remeber the pre-firefox era where a multitude of web sites were “IE only”), Ogg Vorbis, PNG (proper support for transparency), Microsoft-only programming languages (eg. If Microsoft can do that, then via prohibitive licensing and/or simple refusal to reveal the formats and/or protocols, Microsoft is in a position to be able to eliminate any and all alternative platform/competitior.įurther to just inventing its own proprietary and encumbered protocols and formats, we see Microsoft refusing to support formats that are open and unencumbered. Microsoft therefore feels it is in a position to formulate proprietary and/or trade secret formats and protocols for areas of interoperability. It matters because Microsoft has a very dominant market position, a virtual monopoly.
Can you give an honest reason why Microsoft should use the OASIS OpenDocument standard?// Don’t get me wrong, I have no problem with the standard, I use Star Office 8 which defaults to it, but from a user functionality perspective all that really matters in relation to my document needs for interoperability is whether I can open up the same document at work without having to waste a lot of time reformatting it in MS Word format. At best, ODF will present a united front to possibly, some day, erode at the office base. Any review you read of any office suite is going to make comments not based on how well it can read/write ODF files, but how well it can import/export DOC files.
Nisus writer express review iso#
I may be alone on this, but with Microsoft’s command of the Office market, that ISO standard means very little as far as interoperability standards go. I can almost guarentee that 0% if the people that don’t buy MS Office 2007 and choose one of the alternative suites will have that reason. I can only think of 3 or 4 office suites that do support this format, and with their combined market shares they honestly don’t make a dent in the market place for Microsoft to waste any time or money on the issue. Can you give an honest reason why Microsoft should use the OASIS OpenDocument standard? Looking at market share, I don’t see any reason it would be important to them, and technologically speaking I’m not aware of any way that format is supperior to their own open XML format.
Well, considering that ISO standard was just approved less than a month ago, I had to look it up. A decent office suite SHOULD after all support interoperability standards if it is to be at all useable. I believe that Office 2007 is not compliant with ISO standard ISO/IEC 26300. With the new pricing model the price is even reasonable, $149 for Home edtion which includes Word, Excel, Powerpoint, and OneNote.
Nisus writer express review mac#
I don’t do much word processing in Windows anymore, I do most of that on my mac with Nisus Writer Express, but this is the first MS Office product I’ve liked since Office 97, and having played with the beta I fully intend to buy it. I’ve been playing with it all day, and while it did take a little getting used to just because of the way it looks, after about 20 minutes I found myself really enjoying it. I haven’t used KOffice in a year or so, so I don’t want to make baseless comparisons, but I can honestly say that from my experience, no other major word processor has tried to change the standard gui in decades. This is nice and easy to understand, with all the basic functions grouped together in an intelligent manner, without cluttering up the screen. I can’t think of any word processor which doesn’t have all of the same functions in a toolbar for you on startup, this is just a different way of presenting them. I also don’t feel it’s throwing a bunch of options in my face, since if you have the standard home ribbon open, it just shows you the basic stuff: clipboard, font, paragraph, styles, and editing. It has all the basic stuff in little tabs I guess so they stay out of your way, unlike the old system where if you needed many of these functions you had to make a customized toolbar or fill the screen with a million buttons, at which point you start getting confused which button does which. The ribbon seems the opposite of cluttered.
0 kommentar(er)
